In April 2009, he was reported by umpires for having a suspect bowling motion. In the next month, an unbiased check was carried out to evaluate his bowling motion. The check outcomes revealed that Ajmal’s arm flexed inside the permissible 15-degree tolerance set by the International Cricket Council (ICC).
Accused of involvement in spot-fixing scandal
In 2010, within the collection in opposition to England, Pakistan discovered itself concerned in a spot-fixing scandal within the fourth Test. In a secret interview, an alleged fixer named Mazhar Majeed revealed that Ajmal, Abdul Razzaq, Younis Khan, and Shahid Afridi had been people who couldn’t be bribed. He particularly talked about that Ajmal had sturdy non secular beliefs and ideas and was not concerned in such actions.
Inappropriate feedback on ICC
In 2012, after the Test collection in opposition to England, there was confusion surrounding feedback made by Ajmal about his bowling motion in an interview with the BBC. This led to hypothesis and questions concerning the legality of his bowling motion. To handle the problem, journalist George Dobell carried out an in depth investigation and held discussions with the International Cricket Council (ICC). ESPNCricinfo printed an in depth report primarily based on this investigation, offering complete details about the matter and shedding gentle on the discussions held with the ICC. The articles that adopted the investigation emphasised and clarified that Saeed Ajmal’s bowling motion was nicely inside the authorized parameters outlined by the ICC for bowlers.
Accused of unlawful bowling motion
In 2014, after delivering an distinctive efficiency for Worcestershire in opposition to Essex, the place he achieved his career-best innings haul of seven/19, considerations concerning Ajmal’s bowling motion resurfaced. Former England captain Michael Vaughan and present Twenty20 captain Stuart Broad had been amongst those that raised the problem, questioning the legitimacy of Ajmal’s bowling motion. Stuart Broad expressed his opinion that Saeed Ajmal’s bowling motion in aggressive cricket may differ from the motion he used throughout ICC testing. During the testing process for assessing a bowler’s motion, match footage is certainly used together with movies recorded in a managed laboratory setting. This comparability is carried out to make sure that the bowling motion noticed in aggressive matches aligns with the motion recorded within the managed setting. This process was carried out in Saeed Ajmal’s case, and his motion was discovered to be equivalent and in keeping with the beforehand accepted motion. Given Stuart Broad’s feedback elevating questions on Ajmal’s motion, it’s comprehensible that Ajmal reached out to the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) to request an evidence concerning the premise of these feedback. Ajmal sought clarification and sought to deal with any considerations or misunderstandings concerning his bowling motion.
Ban from worldwide cricket
On 9 September 2014, the International Cricket Council (ICC) imposed a ban on him as a consequence of considerations over his bowling motion. In a press release given by them, they mentioned,
An unbiased evaluation has discovered the bowling motion of Pakistan’s off-spinner Saeed Ajmal to be unlawful and, as such, the participant has been suspended from bowling in worldwide cricket with rapid impact. The evaluation revealed that every one his deliveries exceeded the 15 levels stage of tolerance permitted beneath the laws.”
